Trakkr vs LLMrefs
Trakkr and LLMrefs compared on AI engine coverage, starting price, refresh cadence, citation tracking and who each is built for, using only facts published on each vendor's site.
Trakkr vs LLMrefs, with InsightWonder for reference
| Trakkr | LLMrefs | InsightWonder | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product type | Built for AI answers | Built for AI answers | Built for AI answers |
| Starting price | From $100/mo | From $79/mo | From $39/mo |
| Pricing model | Per brand / domain plan | Usage / credit based | Per brand / domain plan |
| Free plan or trial | Free trial | Free trial | Free trial |
| Data refresh | Daily | Weekly minimum, with on-demand checks | Monthly by default; rerun on demand |
| Engines tracked | 8 | 10 | 5 |
| AI engines named on the vendor site | |||
| ChatGPT | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Perplexity | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gemini | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google AI Overviews | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Google AI Mode | — | ✓ | — |
| Claude | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microsoft Copilot | — | ✓ | — |
| Grok | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Meta AI | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| DeepSeek | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Capabilities | |||
| URL-level citation tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor share of voice | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Content generation | — | — | ✓ |
| Distribution / publishing | — | — | ✓ |
| Multi-language / markets | n/p | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agency / multi-brand workspaces | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Built for | Agencies · Mid-market · SMB | SMB · Agencies · Mid-market | SMB · Mid-market |
| Best for | Agencies wanting broad model coverage and client-facing reporting without an enterprise contract. | Small teams and agencies that need many domains and many engines covered on one flat fee. | Brands, DTC stores and content teams that want AI visibility measurement tied directly to what gets published next. |
✓ stated on the vendor site · — not offered or not listed · n/p not published, so we do not guess · Facts verified 2026-09-09
Where Trakkr is stronger, and where LLMrefs is
Both lists are written from published product pages. If a limitation here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
Trakkr
- All eight named models are included on every tier, including the cheapest.
- Connects to GA4 for revenue attribution, plus Looker Studio and an MCP server.
- White-label client portals from the $500 tier.
- 50 prompts per brand at both the $100 and $500 tiers: prompt depth does not scale with price until Enterprise.
- Recommends optimisations and schema but does not generate or publish content.
- The REST API is gated to the $500 tier.
LLMrefs
- Names all ten engines we track, on a single flat plan rather than tiered add-ons.
- Unlimited projects, domains and seats at one price.
- 50+ countries and 20+ languages for geo-targeted prompts.
- The single tier is flagged as limited-time pricing, so the rate may not hold.
- Weekly-minimum refresh is slower than the daily trackers.
- No content generation or distribution.
Related comparisons
Trakkr alternatives
Agencies wanting broad model coverage and client-facing reporting without an enterprise contract.
See alternativesLLMrefs alternatives
Small teams and agencies that need many domains and many engines covered on one flat fee.
See alternativesInsightWonder vs Trakkr
Head-to-head on engines, pricing, citations and what happens after measurement.
Open the comparisonInsightWonder vs LLMrefs
Head-to-head on engines, pricing, citations and what happens after measurement.
Open the comparisonQuestions teams ask before they start
Trakkr vs LLMrefs: which is cheaper?
LLMrefs starts lower ($79/mo vs $100/mo). Starting tiers differ in prompt limits and engines, so compare what each tier includes, not only the price.
Which tracks more AI engines, Trakkr or LLMrefs?
Trakkr names 8 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Grok, Meta AI, DeepSeek); LLMrefs names 10 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Grok, Meta AI, DeepSeek). Only engines written on each vendor's own site are counted.
Who is Trakkr for, and who is LLMrefs for?
Trakkr: Agencies wanting broad model coverage and client-facing reporting without an enterprise contract. LLMrefs: Small teams and agencies that need many domains and many engines covered on one flat fee.
How does InsightWonder differ from Trakkr and LLMrefs?
InsightWonder starts at $39/mo and pairs measurement with content generation and draft-first distribution, so a missed question turns into a published fix. It covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok but not Google AI Overviews or Copilot, and runs monthly by default. Teams that need daily data across Google's AI surfaces should look at Trakkr or LLMrefs first.
How this page was built
Every cell in the table comes from a page on the vendor's own site, opened on the verification date shown. Third-party sources are labelled. Fields a vendor does not publish are marked "not published" rather than guessed. Prices are list prices in USD per month and change; the vendor's pricing page is always the authority.
Turn AI visibility into a repeatable growth system.
Create a project, confirm your market and start measuring the questions that matter.